
|
WHAT'S NEW
AT GRIP? |
|
|
Action Alert!
Tell
Senators Bingaman and Domenici to support Mining Reform! |
|
|
|
2020 VISIONS
With
turnout of 50 - 75 participants at each event, the forums
demonstrated the great interest that community members have
in these issues. And there continues to be a great deal
of energy for moving forward on a number of fronts.
We provide here a brief summary of the individual forums
and outcomes of the final community discussion.
Collaborative Planning for Prosperity and Conservation
We asked Rebecca Carter of the Sonoran Institute
to kick off our forum series by addressing these questions.
Speaking to 75 people at the Global Resource Center on March
22, Dr. Carter described how other “gateway”
communities – those that serve as an entry point into
protected lands – have been affected by rapid growth
and how some have worked to preserve the best aspects of
their communities. View
Rebecca's powerpoint here (2.75MB).
Two pairs of towns in particular served as interesting cases.
On the edge of the Great Smokey Mountains National Park,
Pigeon Forge had lost its character to strip-style development
by businesses serving tourists. Since it had not defined
itself, invested in attractive infrastructure, or asked
businesses to adhere to community standards, it ended up
looking like Anytown, USA. And, faced with a confusion of
signs, driveways, and lights, it would have been nearly
impossible for any individual business to try to improve
things on its own.
Pittman Center, alarmed by what had happened down the road
to Pigeon Forge, conducted a series of community meetings.
Without much difficulty, different sectors of the community
agreed that what defined Pittman Center and made it a great
place to be was its location in the mountains next to the
national park. From there it was a short step to deciding
that the quality of residents’ lives and the attractiveness
of their community to tourists would both be enhanced by
adopting standards for development more in keeping with
the community’s identity. The town invested in rustic
street signs and worked with businesses to encourage signs
and landscaping that were consistent with the community’s
vision. As a result, said Carter, Pittman Center is a far
more attractive destination for tourists.
The second pair of towns, Ketchum and Challis, border a
proposed, 500,000-acre wilderness are in central Idaho.
Ketchum, on the south side of the area and next to the Sun
Valley ski resort, has followed the path of communities
such as Aspen. Certain businesses, including trail outfitters
and river runners in addition to the skiing industry, have
prospered mightily. The natural beauty and recreational
opportunities of the area have attracted wealthy vacation-home
owners who have made realtors and land owners prosperous
as well.
Many longer-term residents of Ketchum and many others attracted
to the area by economic opportunity can not afford to live
in the town, however. According to Carter, small towns an
hour’s drive away have seen radical change as subdivisions
have replaced ranches to meet the demand for housing in
Ketchum.
Challis, on the north
side of the proposed wilderness, has a very different character.
By dint of location and lack of ski resort, it has retained
the rougher, rural feel it has had as a mining town and
trading post since 1876. Many residents want it to stay
that way and have opposed the wilderness proposal. But the
same anti-government stance that fuels this opposition undermines
efforts to preserve the town’s identity. Ex-West Coasters
bought up houses during a mining downturn in the 1990s,
and newcomers have continued to do so even as mining has
restarted, tightening the housing market and changing the
town, wilderness area or no. It’s no Ketchum, but
in a few years it may well not be Challis, either.
Lee
Nellis, now a colleague of Dr. Carter’s at the Sonoran
Institute, commented on Challis’s situation ten years
ago, when he worked as a planner in Idaho. “There’s
a key principle in this planning game,” he told the High Country News. “No one learns anything from
anyone else.”
Community Design for Active Living
Marni Ratzel, Bicycle and Pedestrian Planner for the City
of Boulder, described how Boulder has built an infrastructure
of separated paths and on-road bike lanes that supports human-powered
transportation, active living, and the health of its residents.
Also essential were city ordinances requiring bike racks
when parking lots were built, bike lanes in new developments,
and conservation of “greenbelts” linking different
parts of the city. One result: 16 percent of all commuting
in Boulder is done on bicycle. View
Marni's powerpoint here (Note: this file is 75MB).
Gail Ryba, former coordinator of the NM Bicycle Coalition, Jamie Thomson of the Bicycle Advocacy Group, and Joe
Hutto of the Walkability/Accessibility Advocacy Group
spoke about state and local efforts.
Healthy Environment as Economic Asset
Economist Jennie Rice explained how resource conservation
efforts provide significant economic benefits to local communities.
These range from nature-based tourism and tax savings from
reduced sprawl to increased property values for homes located
next conservation areas and the free provision of services
such as reduced soil erosion and flood buffering. View
Jennie's powerpoint here (196 KB).
Joseph Gendron, Silver City’s Trails and Open Space
Coordinator, discussed the town’s efforts to preserve
open space and develop greenways throughout the city, such
as Boston Hill hiking trails and the possible San Vicente/Big
Ditch trail. View
Joseph's powerpoint here (19.8 MB).
Kevin Bixby, director of the Las Cruces-based Southwest
Environmental Center, presented ideas for developing Mexican
gray wolf-based tourism in the Gila Wilderness. View
Kevin's powerpoint here (1.15 MB).
Local Energy Sustainability
As Mark Sardella, founder of Local Energy in Santa
Fe, pointed out in our fourth forum, creative solutions do
exist for communities that wish to reduce dependence on coal
and natural gas as we enter the post-“Peak Oil”
era. In Santa Fe, his group has a contract to use biomass
to heat buildings. Other options include cultivating oil-producing
algae crops and creating local utilities that use wind or
solar electric generation. He cautioned, however, that it
will be impossible to maintain our current level of energy
use, even if all renewable sources are fully developed, so
people will need to dramatically change their lifestyles.
Gordon West of the Jobs and Biodiversity Project described
that local effort to use small-diameter trees cut from the
forest for manufacturing and heating.
From Plans to Action: A Community Discussion
The culminating event of the 2020 Visions Series, a participatory
forum facilitated by Joanne McEntire, brought people
together to exchange ideas, describe visions, and launch community
projects.
|
|