1872 Mining Reform
House Passes Mining
Reform Bill
Senator Bingamans Energy
and Natural Resources Committee
now working on Senate version
In November, the U.S. House of Representatives
voted 244 to 166 in favor of HR2262, the Hardrock Mining
and Reclamation Act of 2007 sponsored by Representative
Nick Rahall (D-WV) and Representative Jim Costa (D-CA).
By reforming the outdated General Mining Law of 1872,
this bill would protect public lands from irresponsible
mining and safeguard critical drinking water supplies,
fish and wildlife habitat and the health and wellbeing
of our communities. (See Summer 2007 issue of GetAGRIP).
The 1872 Mining Law allows companies to buy valuable
mineral bearing public lands for next to nothing --
$5 an acre- -- and take those minerals without paying
the public any royalty. In New Mexico, more than 55,000
acres or 86 square miles of public lands have already
been sold to private interests for either $2.50 or $5.00
per acre according to mining reform advocacy group,
Earthworks. The law doesn't contain any environmental
provisions and its legacy is hundreds of thousands of
abandoned mines requiring an estimated $32 - $72 billion
to clean up. Under the mining law, mining has been interpreted
as trumping all other uses of public lands even if that
mining would destroy special places or threaten valuable
water supplies.
In response to HR2262's passage, Stephen D'Esposito,
President of Earthworks, stated, "If this effort to
reform the 1872 Mining Law is to succeed, leadership
from the mining industry itself and from community and
political leaders in western states is needed. Each
of these states - from Washington to New Mexico - have
been, and continue to be, adversely affected by this
antiquated law and its lack of adequate protections
for taxpayers and the environment."
Here in Grant County, over 51,000 acres of public lands
have been claimed, the majority by Phelps Dodge, subsidiary
of mining giant Freeport-McMoRan. Under the 1872 Mining
Law, public land managers, such as the Gila National
Forest, find it difficult to deny a mining application
on public land. HR2262 would give public land managers
the ability to balance mining activity with other uses,
such as recreation. Another key provision of HR2262
would establish an 8% royalty on the value of the minerals
extracted (comparable to the 8% to 12.5% royalty paid
by coal, oil and natural gas extractors) to fund clean
up of abandoned hard rock mines on public lands. Statewide,
there are between 10,000 and 20,000 abandoned mines
that need to be reclaimed. Grant, McKinley and Sierra
counties have the greatest number of abandoned mine
sites in New Mexico.
Mining reform would have very tangible environmental
benefits to our Grant County community. New Mexico's
Senator Jeff Bingaman, chairman of the Senate Energy
and Natural Resources Committee, is now working on a
draft of the senate version of HR2262. At a recent senate
committee hearing on mining reform, ranking member,
New Mexico's Senator Pete Domenici, made it clear that
he would support only a watered down version of mining
reform. It is critical that mining communities such
as ours let our New Mexico delegation know that we support
mining reform. Please take action today on behalf of
our local environment and quality of life.
For more information:
TAKE
ACTION TODAY!
Tell Senator Bingaman
and Senator Domenici to support mining reform
Our senators from New Mexico are critical
to passing REAL mining reform.
Industry lobbyists are urging our
senators to vote against real reform of the antiquated
1872 mining law. Senators Bingaman and Domenici need
to hear from Grant Countians who are bearing the cost
of this outdated law.
Tell our
senators to:
- Permanently stop the sell-off of our public
lands where we hike, camp, hunt and fish. Instead
we need a leasing system like the one used for
oil drilling or coal mining on public lands,
where the land title remains in public ownership,
but responsible drilling and mining activities
can take place.
|
- Begin charging a fair fee for copper, gold,
silver, uranium, and other hardrock minerals
owned by the U.S. taxpayer. Presently Congress
is literally giving away taxpayer-owned minerals
like copper to companies such as local mining
giant, Freeport-McMoRan. By beginning to charge
a fair fee for these hardrock minerals, we can
start a clean-up fund to restore wildlife habitat
and waters from historic and present-day mining
activities.
|
- Bring mining on public lands within "multiple-use"
management. Under the 1872 Mining Act, mining
trumps all other uses of public lands. Public
land managers cannot deny a mining claim even
if it will ruin an important water source or
is in an area where the recreational values
are more important economically to local communities.
Mining on public lands should be balanced with
other important uses of our public lands.
|
Senator Jeff Bingaman
703 Hart Senate Office Bldg
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-5521
(202) 224-2852 fax
Email the senator:
senator_bingaman@bingaman.senate.gov.
Senator Pete Domenici
328 Hart Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-6621
(202)228-3261fax
Email form at
http://domenici.senate.gov/resources/contactform.cfm
1872
Mining Law Reform Proposal Falls Short for
New Mexico, Western Communities
State and National Groups Call
for Real Reforms
Washington,
D.C., 1/25: Yesterday, the ranking member of the
Senate and Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Senator
Peter Domenici (R-NM), laid out an agenda for "reform"
of the antiquated 1872 Mining Law that would not adequately
protect taxpayers, communities and the environment from
the potentially destructive impacts of hardrock mining.
"We
have an opportunity to get mining law reform right,
not simply endorse the status quo which would amount
to "sham" reform," said Lauren Pagel,
Policy Director for EARTHWORKS."We have an opportunity
to enact reforms that protect communities, create real
funding for abandoned mine cleanup and reward responsible
mining companies, we should not abandon that opportunity."
The Senator's plan includes three
important pieces of reform, but omits several key provisions
needed to protect public lands, water resources and
western communities. The Senator stated that he would
only consider mining reform that contains these three
provisions - a prospective and profits-based royalty,
an end to patenting and the creation of an abandoned
mine fund. The agenda was silent on protecting special
places and significant public lands, giving western
communities a voice in mine permitting and planning,
and environmental protections.
"This type of sham reform should
be unacceptable to any mining company that wants to
be a good corporate citizen, protect western waters
and communities and clean up abandoned mines,"
continued Pagel.
"A profits-based royalty that
exempts mines currently operating on public lands is
an insult to New Mexico's taxpayers," said Brian
Shields, Executive Director of Amigos Bravos, a river
conservation organization based in New Mexico. "The
mining industry has already reaped billions of dollars
in profit taking minerals from public lands for free.
It is past the time for mining operations to start paying
what they owe - a fair royalty on all mines based on
the value of the mineral being taken from our lands.
New Mexico needs this money to clean up the legacy of
abandoned mines left by this outdated law."
One key item of reform that is missing
from Senator Domenici's agenda is protections for water
resources. The 1872 Mining Law facilitates mining and,
unlike other laws that govern extractive industries,
includes no environmental provisions. Instead, a patchwork
of federal and state laws attempts to regulate the industry.
This has led to spills and contamination and polluted
40% of the headwaters of western watersheds according
to the US EPA. As modern mining problems have demonstrated,
the current system fails to protect western water resources,
public lands, and communities.
"It's clear that Senator Domenici
is not aware of the devastating impacts that mining
brings to rural communities and the environment. These
communities suffer from the boom-and-bust economics
of mining, while the environmental and public health
impacts make creation of a sustainable non-mining economy
difficult, if not impossible. Real and meaningful reform
of the 1872 Mining Law must include clear standards
make sure mining is conducted in the most responsible
manner," continued Shields.
The Senator's plan leaves out another
key piece of real mining law reform -- allowing mining
to be balanced with other important land values such
as drinking water, recreation and wildlife. Under the
current interpretation of law, mining is considered
the "highest and best use" of public lands,
trumping all other uses.
1872 Mining Law reform must allow
communities to protect drinking water sheds, valuable
recreation areas and other vital resources.
For More Information:
Amigos Bravos, 505-362-1063
Gila Resources Information Project, 505-538-8078
EARTHWORKS, 202-887-1872x207
|